Pages

Thursday, September 10, 2015

The Oncoming Storm of Driveless Vehicles...and FedEx!?!?

Did you know that there are driverless vehicles already operating on our roads??!!  I sure didn't...which I found particularly disturbing, as it's my job to know something about everything.  At least that's the way other people (read: friends and family) might look at it.  Needless to say, I found myself intrigued at how much closer this may be to reality than I realized.

A few weeks ago, I was driving up from Florida to Massachusetts, for an obstacle course race.  One of the little inconveniences of driving long distance is that eventually, you have to look for new radio stations.  I mean, there are only so many times you can listen to the same Cd's, and I don't have a Bluetooth connection yet for my radio.  So there I was, surfing the radio for something decent to listen to...in an area apparently bereft of radio signals.  Suddenly, on came NPR (National Public Radio), beginning a program on driverless cars!

At the forefront of the drive to driverless vehicles appears to be Google.  Google has not only developed and tested it's vehicles, but has already logged considerable mileage on public roads.  While some experts say that 2020 is extremely unlikely to see these vehicles on the road for consumers and that even 2025 may be too optimistic, there is a company that says it will have it's vehicle ready by 2017.  Although in all likelihood, that vehicle would probably be limited to a specific, well defined operational area at that point.

Another interesting aspect are the ramifications of this new technology on other areas.  From car insurance to car manufacturers (who are now getting serious about entering the game) to taxi service and beyond.  Even reliance of governments on petty traffic enforcement like speed traps would be impacted by this new technology.  Computers would keep vehicles from exceeding speed limits (which by the way could probably be raised) or parking illegally.  In fact, this new technology would potentially lower the need for individual ownership of cars in the first place, resulting in no need for them to park at all.

Of course, once I started thinking more about this, it became apparent that, like Uber and current airport limo services, driverless 'taxis' would make multiple pickups and drops routinely.  Taking it a step further, since there are now no drivers needing to return home, much longer...substantially longer...trips would now be possible.  Leading to larger vehicles as well as increasing complexity.

Can you imagine, millions upon millions of people scheduling daily (hourly?) rides of virtually unlimited distances?  Potentially hundreds of thousands of vehicles criss-crossing the cities and country to meet these needs.  At first I thought of the concept of airline hubs...concentrating riders regionally.  This was different however.  Even the airport hub system requires people to start from a limited number of airport locations.

And that's when it become clear.  There was already an industry that was moving millions of items daily to and from almost anywhere.  And one particular company in fact that had not only pioneered the logistics necessary for this, but was at the forefront today of this industry.  FedEx!  After all, picking up people/packages from numerous locations and transporting/delivering them to their destination is a very similar process.  While there are any number of technology/software companies to watch in relation to building/operating the actual vehicles, I would be very surprised not to see FedEx as a big winner when it comes to actually implementing a new driverless vehicle-for-hire network.  Possibly even operating like a utility with multiple companies actually owning and operating the vehicles themselves.

Another interesting incidental impact would be on the whole concept of Transit Oriented Development (TOD), where developments are concentrated near mass transit hubs.  These TOD's generally eliminate the need for individual transportation (read: cars), while allowing residents easy access to any other similarly interconnected locale.  But with the advent of these driverless vehicles, it would no longer require a person to live near these mass transit hubs, which may put a completely new light on even this aspect of our lives.

We never quite know how much change a new technology may bring.  In the end, driverless vehicles may impact our lives in ways that we can't even imagine today.  One thing is for certain, if the technology succeeds in putting 'no-one' behind the wheel, the changes will be immense!



What do you think about driverless vehicles?


 

Wednesday, September 9, 2015

Three Reasons I'm Not Looking Forward to the Upcoming Season of Doctor Who


I've been watching Doctor Who for so long now that I can't remember when I first saw it.  Starting back when it was still a relatively low budget, 1950's style sci-fi show.  It was an odd match for my tastes even then...I've always leaned more towards the Star Wars style, but good acting and decent plots always trumped on-screen glitz (take a note George Lucas!) 

However, it was never really a show that I was overly fanatical about (don't try to tell that to my brother-in-law though).  That changed in 2005 with the latest incarnation of The Doctor with Christopher Eccleston and Billie Piper as Rose Tyler.  From that point on I was drawn back into the world of Doctor Who and the show seemed to become better with every show...and with each new Doctor.

While I enjoyed Eccleston, the next Doctor, David Tennant, stepped it up another notch and continued to draw me into this 21st century version of Doctor Who.  But the pinnacle of these latest versions of The Doctor has to be Matt Smith.  From the very first episode it was obvious he brought a new dimension and a new chemistry to the show.  It also brought with it a new audience.

Along with Amy (Karen Gillan), Rory (Arthur Darvill) and of course River Song (Alex Kingston) the show achieved that near perfect inter-relationship of characters and story that were mesmerizing to watch.  It also brought together the pieces for that rare show which can be enjoyed by the whole family.  My grandchildren (to my daughter's lasting chagrin) loved this new Doctor Who.

So what happened?  The next Doctor (Peter Capaldi), while I find him more than capable and a great Doctor Who personally, apparently does not have the character appeal for the younger viewer of the Matt Smith Doctor.  The show immediately had a darker feel than the previous shows.  Two episodes in and my grandchildren were now done with Doctor Who (to my daughter's anti-chagrin).

So what's all this concern over the upcoming season?  While I feel (once Danny disappeared...mind-boggling to me how that 'character' lasted as long as he did!) that the show's new darker setting was quite entertaining, there are several things I personally just cringe at every time they appear.  Now I know these are central to the Doctor Who series and that purists will be burning me in effigy, or at least pointing some very angry sonics this way.  But the three things that appear to be coming up next season that are most likely to have me switching channels are:

1) Daleks - Yes, I get it, they've been there from the beginning and I have no problem when these antiquated mobile cement mixers are an ancillary part of the story.  But if I have to watch and listen to these things for any length of time....gone!

2) Cybermen - Again, same story as the Daleks.  Ancillary...fine...but these are 1950's robots that are about as threatening as a blowup punching bag and I think we deserve better.

3) The Master - I mean...how many times are you going to kill this guy.  I feel like I'm watching the worst-of-the-worst soap opera reincarnation specials.  I realize he's a Time Lord...regenerations and all...but please, let him/her go.  Mostly because I just despise the original character I suppose.  But this one is likely to bring out to remote.

Hopefully I'm wrong...it has been known to happen, every few minutes or so.  And certainly the return of River Song can't hurt.  I truly have enjoyed Capaldi's Doctor and have even come to enjoy the character of Clara ( Jenna Coleman)...although that has admittedly been one that's had to grow on me a bit.

So while I go into this next season as open minded as possible, I can't help feeling that this new direction will be one I'm not going to enjoy...even with the prospect of an Alex Kingston Christmas.  And I'm more concerned that this direction will lose the newest, future fans.  But you never know.  I never would have expected the 2005 resurrection in the first place...and that has been a great joy in the world of sci-fi TV!!



What are your favorite...or least favorite...Doctor Who characters?

I would love to hear what you think about the upcoming season!